Relational pedagogical mediation and technological automation in higher education: a scoping review from the TRIC paradigm

Authors

  • Rafael Villegas Velasco Universidad Tecnologica de Cancun image/svg+xml Author
    • Myriam López Pérez Universidad La Salle Cancún Author

      DOI:

      https://doi.org/10.68038/ghsycc40

      Keywords:

      TRIC, relational factor, relational pedagogical mediation, higher education, digital learning environments, artificial intelligence in education, educational quality

      Abstract

      The digitalization of higher education, intensified by the global health crisis and the integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI), has configured learning environments primarily oriented toward operational efficiency, with documented implications for the relational dimension of the educational process. This article examines the role of the Relational Factor (R Factor) within the TRIC paradigm (Technologies of Relationship, Information and Communication) as a conceptual framework for understanding and reorienting teaching practices in digital higher education contexts. A scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O’Malley (2005) protocol, based on a systematic search in Scopus, EBSCOhost, Web of Science, Redalyc, and SciELO, limited to the period 2016-2026. The final analytical corpus consisted of 45 sources selected according to explicit criteria of conceptual relevance and academic quality. The findings identify three main mechanisms through which technological automation erodes the pedagogical bond: the depersonalization of feedback, the temporal compression of reflection, and the normalization of student isolation. Building on this diagnosis, the article proposes relational pedagogical mediation, articulated across diagnostic, design, and ethical dimensions, as both an analytical category and a professional practice for teaching in technology-mediated environments. The need for empirical research in Latin American contexts examining the impact of these practices on variables such as academic persistence and institutional belonging is also identified. The study concludes that technological integration in higher education requires incorporating the relational dimension as a central criterion in pedagogical design, teacher training, and educational quality assessment.

      References

      Achuthan, Krishnashree., Kolil, Vysakh Kani., Muthupalani, Sharanya., & Raman, Raghu.(2024). Transactional distance theory in distance learning: Past, current, and future research trends. In Contemporary Educational Technology (Vol. 16). Bastas. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14131

      Area-Moreira, Manuel. (2022).Tecnología educativa: La enseñanza y el aprendizaje con TIC (Universidad de La Laguna, Ed.; 1).

      Ariel, Nana., Millikovsky-Ayalon, Maaian., & Kimchi-Feldhorn, Omri. (2023). Redesigning the MOOC “Learning How to Learn.”. International Society of the Learning Sciences https://doi.org/10.22318/icls2023.569390

      Arksey, Hilary., & O’Malley, Lisa. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

      Aveleyra, Rocío. (2023). Informe regional: educación superior en América Latina. Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales. https://www.clacso.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/INFORME-REGIONAL-AMERICA-LATINA.pdf

      Biesta, Gert. (2022). World-centred education: A view for the Present. Routledge.

      Black, Paul., & Wiliam, Dylan. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5

      Castañeda, Linda., & Selwyn, Neil. (2018). More than tools? Making sense of the ongoing digitizations of higher education. In International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education (Vol. 15, Number 1). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0109-y

      CEPAL. (2020). Universalizar el acceso a las tecnologías digitales para enfrentar los efectos del COVID-19. https://repositorio.cepal.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/b03540f1-8133-434d-8b62-2f0738515533/content

      Cleveland-Innes, Martha., & Wilton, Dan. (2018). Guide to Blended Learning. Commonwealth of Learning.

      Feenberg, Andrew. (2002). Transforming Technology: A Critical Theory Revisited. Oxford University Press.

      Freire, Paulo. (2005). Pedagogía del oprimido (2nd ed.). Siglo XXI Editores.

      Gabelas-Barroso, José Antonio, & Marta-Lazo, Carmen. (2020). La era TRIC: Factor R-elacional y Educomunicación. Egregius.

      Garrison, D. Randy., Anderson, Terry., & Archer, Walter. (2000). Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1096-7516(00)00016-6

      Gascón, Patricia., Morte Nadal, Tamara., & Manrique Villanueva, Lina Maria Patricia. (2024). El Factor Relacional en la era de la IA (Vol. 189). Colección Conocimiento Contemporáneo.

      Gravett, Karen (2023). Relational Pedagogies: Connections and Mattering in Higher Education. Bloomsbury.

      Hattie, John (2023). Visible Learning: The Sequel: A Synthesis of Over 2,100 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. InVisible Learning: The Sequel: A Synthesis of Over 2,100 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003380542

      Holmes, Wayne., Bialik, Maya, & Fadel, Charles (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. The Center for Curriculum Redesign.

      Luckin, Rosemary. (2018). Machine learning and human intelligence: the future of education for the 21st century. UCL Institute of Education Press.

      Marcelo, Carlos, & Vaillant, Denisse (2018). Hacia una formación disruptiva de los docentes. 10 claves para el cambio. Narcea Ediciones.

      Mattalo, Brandon (2024). Artificial Intelligence: The Future of Pedagogy. Journal of Legal Studies Education, 41(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlse.12146

      Morozov, Evgeny. (2016). La locura del solucionismo tecnológico . Katz Editores.

      Nayir, Funda, Sari, Tamer.., & Bozkurt, Aras (2024). Reimagining education: Bridging artificial intelligence, transhumanism, and critical pedagogy. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 7, 102–115. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1308022

      Noddings, Nel (2013). Caring: A Relational Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. University of California Press.

      Parra, Eucario (2021). Análisis sobre comportamientos é ticos en la educación virtual. Revista Interamericana de Investigación Educación y Pedagogía RIIEP , 14. https://doi.org/10.15332/25005421.6059

      Peters, Micah DJ., Godfrey, Christina., McInerney, Patricia., Munn, Zachary., Tricco, Andrea C., & Khalil, Hanan (2020). Chapter 11: Scoping reviews. In E. Aromataris & Z. Munn (Eds.), JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-12

      Reeves-Huapaya, Enma Sofía., Quispe-Berríos, Haydeé., Saravia-Parra, Leonardo., Chambilla-Baylón, Jaime Renee., Rucoba-del Castillo, Luis Ronald., Vásquez-Dorado, Judith Elena., Oscco-Solorzano, Rolando., & Jaime-Andia, Mario (2025). Exploring inclusión and digital literacy in Latin America as a means for social change: a systematic literature review. In Social Sciences and Humanities Open (Vol. 12). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102219

      Rivas, Axel., Scasso, Martín., Larsen, María Emilia., & Jaureguizar, Mariano (2020). Las llaves de la educación. Estudio comparado sobre la mejora de los sistemas educativos subnacionales en América Latina . Fundación Santillana.

      Romero Alonso, Rosa., Araya Carvajal, Katherine., Andrade Carvajal, Francisca., & Montero Godoy, Karla (2025). Factores de abandono en la formación online: una revisión sistemática de literatura. Cuadernos de Investigación Educativa , 16. https://doi.org/10.18861/cied.2025.16.2

      Rotar, Olga (2022). Online student support: a framework for embedding support interventions into the online learning cycle. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-021-00178-4

      Selwyn, Neil (2022). Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.

      Seng, Athena., Li, Jing., & Cheong, Angus (2025). Educational Transformation in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Integrating Generative AI and Human Intelligence to Enhance Educational Quality. https://bit.ly/edu-transformation

      Tedesco, Juan Carlos (2020). Educación y justicia: el sentido de la educación . Fundación Santillana.

      Tinto, Vincent (2017). Reflections on Student Persistence. Student Success, 8, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v8i2.376

      Turkle, Sherry (2017). En defensa de la conversación: El poder de la conversación en la era digital. Ático de los Libros.

      UANL. (2025). Retos de la educación no presencial en América Latina y El Caribe (R. L. Cavazos Salazar & M. E. Morocho Quezada, Eds.). Editorial Universitaria UANL.

      UNESCO. (2022). La encrucijada de la educación en América Latina y el Caribe: Informe regional de monitoreo ODS4-Educación 2030 . www.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-sp

      UNESCO-IESALC. (2025). IESALC Informe Anual 2024. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000394376_spa

      Vaughan, Norman D., Cleveland-Innes, Martha., & Garrison, D. Randy. (2013). Teaching in Blended Learning Environments: Creating and Sustaining Communities of Inquiry. AU Press.

      Vygotsky, Lev S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.

      Weller, Martin (2020). 25 Years of Ed Tech. AU Press.

      Wenger, Etienne. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press.

      World Economic Forum. (2026). The Human Advantage: Stronger Brains in the Age of AI. https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-human-advantage-stronger-brains-in-the-age-of-ai/

      Zhong, Ruojun., & Zhao, Yong (2025). Education Paradigm Shifts in the Age of AI: A Spatiotemporal Analysis of Learning. ECNU Review of Education, 8, 319–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311251315204

      Published

      2026-07-01

      How to Cite

      Villegas Velasco, R., & López Pérez, M. (2026). Relational pedagogical mediation and technological automation in higher education: a scoping review from the TRIC paradigm. Sekkan Revista de Ciencias Sociales Y Humanidades, 3(5), 30-47. https://doi.org/10.68038/ghsycc40